Prevention and Education
How Does Intimate Partner Violence Increase STI Risk? Understanding the Dangerous Connection
May 6, 2025
Intimate partner violence increases STI risk by 2.5 times through multiple mechanisms including forced unprotected sex, reproductive coercion, and limited healthcare access. According to the CDC, abusive partners often sabotage contraception and prevent victims from negotiating safe sex practices, creating a dangerous cycle that threatens both physical and sexual health. This connection requires healthcare approaches that address safety and sexual health simultaneously.
The Hidden Link Between Abuse and Sexual Health
Intimate partner violence (IPV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) may seem like separate health concerns, but research consistently shows a strong connection between them. People experiencing abuse from intimate partners face unique barriers to protecting their sexual health, leading to significantly higher rates of STIs.
Studies reveal that individuals in abusive relationships are up to 2.5 times more likely to contract STIs compared to those in healthy relationships, according to research published by the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. This alarming statistic highlights the critical need to understand how abuse impacts sexual health decisions and outcomes.
How Abusive Relationships Increase STI Risk
Power and Control Dynamics
Abusive relationships fundamentally revolve around power and control. This dynamic directly impacts sexual health in several ways:
Forced unprotected sex: Abusers may refuse to use condoms or other barrier methods
Limited negotiation ability: Victims often cannot safely discuss or insist on protection
Restricted healthcare access: Abusers frequently monitor or prevent medical visits
Sexual assault: Non-consensual sexual contact increases STI transmission risk
Reproductive Coercion
Reproductive coercion is a specific form of abuse where partners interfere with contraception and reproductive choices. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recognizes this as a serious form of abuse that includes:
Condom sabotage: Deliberately damaging condoms before or during sex
Birth control interference: Hiding, discarding, or tampering with contraceptives
Pressure tactics: Using threats or manipulation to prevent protection use
Pregnancy coercion: Forcing pregnancy as a control mechanism
The National Domestic Violence Hotline reports that approximately 25% of people who contact them have experienced some form of reproductive coercion, underscoring how commonly sexual health is weaponized in abusive situations.
Warning Signs and Risk Assessment
Recognizing Red Flags
Healthcare providers, friends, and family should be aware of warning signs that may indicate both IPV and increased STI risk:
Unexplained injuries or inconsistent explanations
Partner who refuses to leave during medical appointments
Difficulty making or keeping appointments without partner approval
Hesitancy discussing sexual health history with providers
Recurring STIs despite reported treatment adherence
Expressed fear of partner's reaction to STI diagnosis
Sudden changes in sexual health or unexpected STIs in long-term relationships
Assessing Combined Risk
When evaluating STI risk, healthcare providers should incorporate questions about relationship dynamics, such as:
"Do you feel comfortable discussing condom use with your partner?"
"Has anyone ever made you have sex when you didn't want to?"
"Do you have control over when and how you use protection?"
"Are you worried about your partner's reaction if you ask to use protection?"
These questions can reveal critical information about a patient's ability to protect themselves from STIs within their relationship context.
Safety Planning That Includes Sexual Health
Comprehensive Protection Strategies
Effective safety planning for IPV survivors must address both physical safety and sexual health protection:
Emergency contraception access: Information on obtaining and safely storing emergency contraception
Discreet protection methods: Partner-independent options like IUDs or injectable contraceptives
Hidden testing resources: Mobile clinics, at-home testing kits, or our trusted partner STDcheck which provides confidential testing services that can be crucial for those in abusive relationships
Documentation strategies: Safely recording sexual health incidents related to abuse
Technology safety: Using incognito browsing and password protection when researching STI information
Creating an Integrated Safety Plan
A comprehensive safety plan might include:
Trusted contacts: Identifying healthcare providers who understand IPV dynamics
Code words: Establishing signals with trusted friends to indicate need for STI testing help
Hidden supplies: Safely storing condoms, dental dams, or emergency contraception
Documentation system: Securely tracking incidents of reproductive coercion
Exit strategy: Incorporating sexual health needs in plans to leave the relationship
Resources for Survivors Seeking STI Care
Specialized Support Services
Several organizations offer integrated services addressing both IPV and sexual health:
Domestic violence shelters: Many now provide STI testing and sexual health services
Community health centers: Trained in trauma-informed care for abuse survivors
Telehealth options: Remote consultations that can be accessed safely and privately
Survivor advocacy groups: Peer support specifically for sexual health after abuse
Accessing Confidential Care
Survivors seeking confidential STI care should know:
Title X clinics provide confidential services regardless of ability to pay
According to the Guttmacher Institute, many states allow minors to consent to STI testing without parental notification
Patient portals can be set up with secure passwords unknown to abusive partners
Some clinics offer alternative communication methods (like secure messaging systems) if phone calls are monitored
The CDC's GetTested resource helps locate confidential testing sites nationwide
Our trusted partner STDcheck offers discreet and confidential testing that can be particularly valuable for survivors who need testing without their partner's knowledge or interference
The Healthcare Provider's Role
Trauma-Informed Screening Approaches
Healthcare providers can implement trauma-informed approaches when screening for both IPV and STIs, as recommended by the CDC's Violence Prevention Division:
Creating private moments to screen patients away from partners
Using inclusive, non-judgmental language
Offering multiple options for disclosure (verbal, written, electronic)
Recognizing trauma responses may affect patient engagement
Understanding that disclosure happens gradually as trust builds
Following the FUTURES Without Violence CUES approach (Confidentiality, Universal Education, Empowerment, and Support)
Integrated Treatment Models
Effective healthcare models address both IPV and STI risk simultaneously:
SANE (Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner) programs: Provide both evidence collection and STI prophylaxis
IPV/HIV integrated services: Special programs designed for those at dual risk
Warm referral systems: Direct connections between DV services and sexual health clinics
Follow-up protocols: Systems ensuring survivors can safely receive test results and treatment
Breaking the Cycle: Prevention and Education
Community-Level Interventions
Breaking the connection between IPV and STIs requires comprehensive approaches:
Bystander intervention training: Teaching communities to recognize and safely intervene in abusive situations
Healthy relationship education: School and community programs teaching consent and communication
Provider training: Ensuring healthcare workers recognize the IPV-STI connection
Public awareness campaigns: Reducing stigma around both IPV and STIs
Empowerment Through Knowledge
Education specifically addressing the IPV-STI connection helps survivors:
Recognize reproductive coercion as abuse
Understand their rights regarding sexual health
Access resources designed for their unique circumstances
Make informed decisions about testing and treatment
Moving Forward: Policy and Research Needs
Policy Recommendations
To better address the IPV-STI connection, policy changes should include:
Mandatory IPV screening in STI clinics
Increased funding for integrated services
Insurance coverage for confidential STI services
Legal protections for survivors seeking sexual healthcare
Future Research Directions
Critical research areas include:
Effectiveness of integrated screening tools
Long-term sexual health outcomes for IPV survivors
Interventions specifically addressing reproductive coercion
Models for trauma-informed STI care
Conclusion
The connection between intimate partner violence and sexually transmitted infections represents a critical public health issue requiring integrated approaches. By recognizing how abuse impacts sexual health decisions and outcomes, healthcare providers, advocates, and communities can develop more effective strategies to support survivors.
Breaking the silence around this connection is essential to developing comprehensive care that addresses both immediate safety needs and long-term sexual health. Through education, policy change, and compassionate care, we can work toward a future where everyone has the ability to protect their sexual health, free from coercion and violence.
For those needing confidential STI testing, our partner STDcheck is a trusted resource that provides discreet, reliable testing services that can be especially valuable for those in complicated or potentially dangerous relationship situations.
If you or someone you know is experiencing intimate partner violence, contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233 or text START to 88788. For STI testing and resources, visit the CDC's STI information page or call the CDC INFO line at 1-800-232-4636.
This article provides general information and is not intended as medical or legal advice. Always consult qualified professionals regarding your specific situation.

Dr. Emily Carter
Dr. Emily Carter is a highly experienced sexologist with a passion for fostering healthy relationships and promoting sexual education. She actively supports the LGBTQ+ community through consultations, workshops, and awareness campaigns. Privately, she conducts research on how sexual education influences social acceptance.